Compare and contrast the Erechtheum and the Pantheon Essay

Compare and contrast the Erechtheum and the Pantheon - Essay drillOf course it had always been referred to that the Romans were imitative of Greek civilisation. The same can be said in their architecture. Barstow makes for an fire commentary when he said that Roman architecture has been called merely Greek architecture imitated with greater greatness exactly less refinement. No doubt the Greeks were greater originators, but the Romans were more practical, and, being great builders they protracted the art in e truly direction. Yet, where they changed or modified the Greek, they did not always improve it (p. 49).The columns are the very main foundation of both the Erechtheum and the Pantheon. It served not only a decorative, and magnificently so at that, but also as the main source of strength of the deuce buildings. When we see the Erechtheum and the Pantheon we are immediately transported to the culture of a former world and its lush sense of style that has continued to captiva te the essence of aim up to this day. There are many similarities between these architectures and this may be palpable in the dickens structures but there are also differences that may be perceived, especially in the Pantheon which came much posterior than the Erechtheum and thus contains some improvements and innovations. The Erechtheum is a temple built for the goddess Athena Polias with Ionic design. The design is characterized by two chambers where one faces west and the other faces east. There is a debate as to which direction is really devoted to Athena but there is belief that it is the western end the Erechtheum while in the easterly portion is that of Poseidon-Erechtheus, Hephaestus and Boutes. The Erechtheum is actually the name of one of its cellas, the same way the Pantheon derived its name. An interesting tidbit of history was divulged by Pausinias to describe the worship for Athena of the people. He tells that even though there are many of those who had already con verted to Christianity, they still hold a special reverence for Athena and the Erechtheum. The image in the Acropolis was considered to be most holy. Legend says that it fell from the sky with a lamp that never goes out of oil easily though it is lighted throughout (George, n.p.). The most distinct design of Roman architecture is their subroutine of arches. This was not hot when they incorporated it into their construction but it was revolutionized by the Romans. Where the Greeks usually employed straight lines, the Romans made use of arches to tump over a softer feel to the look of the buildings. This is an integral aspect of the Pantheon which is essentially a dome that fully embraces the use of an arch. This transformed the total design of a building. It was also during the time of the Romans where the use of cement which is basically rock n roll that were ground and sand mixed as a wet component proliferated. This technique was actually answerable and made it possible to bu ild the Pantheon. But unlike the Greeks, the Romans built more than temples